Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Google Copies Your Hard Drive - Government Smiles In Anticip
BleepingComputer.com > General Topics > News
   
KoanYorel
Consumers Should Not Use New Google Desktop

San Francisco Google announced a new "feature" of its
Google Desktop software that greatly increases the risk to
consumer privacy. If a consumer chooses to use it, the new
"Search Across Computers" feature will store copies of the
user's computers. EFF urges consumers not to use this feature,
because it will make their personal
data more vulnerable to subpoenas from the government and
possibly private litigants, while providing a convenient
one-stop-shop for hackers who've obtained a user's Google
password.


"Coming on the heels of serious consumer concern about
government snooping into Google's search logs, it's shocking
that Google expects its users to now trust it with the
contents of their personal computers," said EFF Staff
Attorney Kevin Bankston. "Unless you configure Google
Desktop very carefully, and few people will, Google will
have copies of your tax returns, love letters, business
records, financial and medical files, and whatever other
text-based documents the Desktop software can index. The
government could then demand these personal files with only
a subpoena rather than the search warrant it would need to
seize the same things from your home or business, and in
many cases you wouldn't even be notified in time to
challenge it. Other litigants--your spouse, your business
partners or rivals, whomever--could also try to cut out the
middleman (you) and subpoena Google for your files."

The privacy problem arises because the Electronic
Communication Privacy Act of 1986, or ECPA, gives only
limited privacy protection to emails and other files that
are stored with online service providers--much less privacy
than the legal protections for the same information when
it's on your computer at home. And even that lower level of
legal protection could disappear if Google uses your data
for marketing purposes. Google says it is not yet scanning
the files it copies from your hard drive in order to serve
targeted advertising, but it hasn't ruled out the
possibility, and Google's current privacy policy appears to
allow it.

"This Google product highlights a key privacy problem in the
digital age," said Cindy Cohn, EFF's Legal Director. "Many
Internet innovations involve storing personal files on a
service provider's computer, but under outdated laws,
consumers who want to use these new technologies have to
surrender their privacy rights. If Google wants consumers to
trust it to store copies of personal computer files, emails,
search histories and chat logs, and still 'not be evil,' it
should stand with EFF and demand that Congress update the
privacy laws to better reflect life in the wired world."

Google can and should design its technologies to avoid these
problems in the first place. For example, searching across
computers can be accomplished without Google having to keep
copies of those computers' contents. Alternatively, Google
could encrypt the stored data such that only the user has
access.

"Google constantly touts its creative brainpower. More
privacy-protective technologies are surely not beyond its
reach, so long as its engineers make that a design
priority," added Bankston.

(Reproduction of this publication in electronic media is encouraged.
Press releases and EFF announcements & articles may be reproduced individually at will.)

Scarlett
Which is excactly why I will never use any
"destop search" feature no matter whose it is.
phawgg
QUOTE
"This Google product highlights a key privacy problem in the
digital age," said Cindy Cohn, EFF's Legal Director. "Many
Internet innovations involve storing personal files on a
service provider's computer, but under outdated laws,
consumers who want to use these new technologies have to
surrender their privacy rights. If Google wants consumers to
trust it to store copies of personal computer files, emails,
search histories and chat logs, and still 'not be evil,' it
should stand with EFF and demand that Congress update the
privacy laws to better reflect life in the wired world."


Which is why I will.
I welcome an opportunity to highlight what is really wrong.
I saw it coming when I tested the beta in the first place.

Ya' think our government deserves to be able to "benefit" by it's lawful right to spend our money
searching a few million PC user's files? Then a few million more when they can ...
The ones stupid enough to be doing terrorist acts on the side?
Law Enforcement dredging up last year's PC files for the Prosecuting Attorney's pleasure?

Maybe just being Democrats during a Republican administration?
What entity controls the internet as it is developing?
The NSA?
CIA?
FBI?
Republican National Committee?

I guess I'll ultimately find out using the Desktop Search, huh?
Especially if I bait 'em ...
Scarlett
QUOTE
Google admits Desktop Security Risk
By Tom Espiner
Special to CNET News.com
Published: February 20, 2006, 9:50 AM PST


Businesses have been warned by research company Gartner that the latest Google Desktop Beta has an "unacceptable security risk," and Google agrees.

On Feb. 9, Google unveiled Google Desktop 3, a free, downloadable program that includes an option to let users search across multiple computers for files. To do that, the application automatically stores copies of files, for up to a month, on Google servers. From there, copies are transferred to the user's other computers for archiving. The data is encrypted in transmission and while stored on Google servers.
tg1911
QUOTE(phawgg @ Feb 16 2006, 12:11 AM) *
I guess I'll ultimately find out using the Desktop Search, huh?
Especially if I bait 'em ...

phawgg,
If you just want to bait them: hysterical.gif

Patriot Search
A search engine that lets you report yourself to the
authorities -- before someone else does.
Patriot Search

Be sure to check out the links under the search field, Our mission, Our search syntax, and Our privacy policy:
phawgg
Oh, thank you tg1911 thumbup.gif

The plot thickens.
The anticipation of just this one citizen is killin' him. hysterical.gif
I was wondering how several million other ones are takin' this.
Then I thought about the yellow page listings of attorneys ...

I wonder if a new specialty will develop.
Full page ads showing the firm in a hardwood paneled office around an enormous desk,
the boldface list of litigation specialties on the side now headed up by:

Patriot Act Defense
Michael Giacchetti
QUOTE
Also, according to Mercury News, the government said while Google didn’t hand over the information, “other, unspecified search engines” did agree to release it. (Who’s that? Yahoo? A9? MSN? Amazon book search? Ask Jeeves?)
conflicts??
jgweed
Yahoo and MSN quietly complied in some way or another, with the government request, just like they regularly comply with the Chinese Internet Police.
Regards,
John
Michael Giacchetti
QUOTE
So, who was it that gave away the data upon request? According to ZDnet, who’s quoting an attorney for the American Civil Liberties Union, those were Microsoft and AOL (who fully complied) as well as Yahoo (who complied in parts). ZDnet writes that a Microsoft spokesperson said, “MSN works closely with law enforcement officials worldwide to assist them when requested ... It is our policy to respond to legal requests in a very responsive and timely manner in full compliance with applicable law.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2009 Invision Power Services, Inc.