Back in the 70's the national speed limit was brought down to 55 in an effort to combat high gas prices.
I am curious what people think of reducing speed limits again; not only for the current gas crunch but also for a reduction in traffic fatalities.
Oregon has the lowest speed limit in the nation, I believe: 65 mph (105 km/h). This speed is only allowed on certain main highways (such as parts of I5, I84, and 205). Everywhere else is 55 mph (89 km/h) (recently a section of I84 was raised to 60 mph (97 km/h)).
5-10 mph doesn't seem like a lot of difference, but it is. It's in the math:
KE = ½mv²
Kenetic Energy = one-half the mass of the car multiplied by the car's velocity squared. So, as you increase velocity, there is exponential growth in the amount of energy in a possible wreck.
There are many two-lane highways - without meridians - throughout the US on which the speed limit is 75 mph. Granted there are a lot of long, empty regions through which any traveler would like to pass through quickly; but remember, many traffic fatalities occur on such roads.
One might argue that a head-on collision at 55 mph can be deadly as well; this is true. However, the variables and the odds for such an accident generally increase with speed.
My personal feeling is that major two-lane highways ought to have concrete meridians and a speed limit of 65 mph. Expensive and excessive, one might say, but the number of saved lives would be worth it.
