I feel what Mrs. Erceg is saying. I think the op is saying if you can't see it or have physical proof of religion, it's most likely bs.
I had a chem 201 professor explain to me about the speed and path of sub atomic orbitals. The are going very fast, almost hitting into one another at every revolution but still things are in perfect balance. Also, the sun and the stars and human beings and the computer I'm using, everything when broken down can be seen as quarks, just arranged in different ways. What I'm saying is life is too perfect to be random. Call it whatever you want.
I had a chem 201 professor explain to me about the speed and path of sub atomic orbitals. The are going very fast, almost hitting into one another at every revolution but still things are in perfect balance. Also, the sun and the stars and human beings and the computer I'm using, everything when broken down can be seen as quarks, just arranged in different ways. What I'm saying is life is too perfect to be random. Call it whatever you want.
hmm, i see what you're saying, and I agree a little, but escape the prison of the moment!!! I will pick on Christianity for a moment. The religion, in terms of power in culture, ideals, and members has evolved very much in only the past 2000 years. Just think, years ago the pope was putting people to death for saying that the earth orbitted the sun. And for tring to prove why gravity existed. They were hiding books that had were filled with scientific thoughts and theories that if they had not been held back, may have changed the way the world is today hugely. The flutter of a butterfly it could be called.
So you say the world is too perfect, I say that maybe if religion hadn't held our species back, maybe we would have disproved him by now.
But what do i know. I'm just a college student who looks at evidence and doesnt just believe everything out of a big book because everyone says its true.
